We use cookies in order to improve the quality and usability of the HSE website. More information about the use of cookies is available here, and the regulations on processing personal data can be found here. By continuing to use the site, you hereby confirm that you have been informed of the use of cookies by the HSE website and agree with our rules for processing personal data. You may disable cookies in your browser settings.

  • A
  • A
  • A
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • ABC
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
  • А
Regular version of the site
Article
Will the Arctic Cooperation System Accommodate Global Geopolitical Changes?

Strelnikova I., Chistikov M., Shuranova A.

Russia in Global Affairs. 2025. Vol. 23. No. 2. P. 23-37.

Book chapter
Learning in, about and from the field? Symbolic functions of EU knowledge production on Central Asia

Korneev O., Kluczewska K.

In bk.: EU–Central Asian Interactions: Perceptions, Interests and Practices. Abingdon: Routledge, 2024. Ch. 3. P. 38-58.

Contacts

17/1 Malaya Ordynka Str., Moscow, 119017

Administration
School Head Alexander Lukin
Deputy Head Ivan Krivushin

Status and Power Transitions; Explaining Russia and China's Diverging Approaches to Status Seekin

Professor Andrej Krickovic was recognized as the best paper presenter at the  Social Science and Humanities Research Association's 2nd Annual International Conference in Pattaya, Thailand, June 26-27, 2018

Status and Power Transitions; Explaining Russia and China's Diverging Approaches to Status Seekin

Though both China and Russia are dissatisfied with their current status in the international order, the nature of their dissatisfaction is different. The paper explores these differences by comparing their foreign policies and by examining academic and expert debate in both countries. China, a rising power, is primarily concerned with status inconsistency, i.e. that its status gains are not keeping pace with its growing material capabilities. Russia, a declining power, exhibits status anxiety, i.e. it fears that its declining capabilities will lead to a loss of great power status. These different forms of status dissatisfaction produce different policies. China tries to gradually shape the evolution of the international order in ways that increase its status and is careful not to undermine the parts of the order that contribute to its rise. Russia openly challenges the order and is willing to destabilizing it if this can lead to status gains that reverse its decline. These findings add to the growing literature on status by exploring the different forms that status dissatisfaction can take and tracing their effects on status seeking behavior. This, in turn, helps us develop a better understanding of the power transitions currently under way in the international system.